Double Homicide: When a “Clump of Cells” Magically Becomes a Person

Let’s take a moment to appreciate one of modern society’s greatest legal mysteries: the case of the unborn child who is somehow not a person, until it becomes inconvenient for it not to be.

We’re told, very confidently, that a fetus isn’t a person. Not really. Not legally. Not scientifically. Just a developing “clump of cells,” a medical term that sounds way more clinical than “tiny human with a heartbeat.” That heartbeat? Just noise. The fingers, toes, brain activity? Irrelevant. Until birth, we’re told it’s essentially potential life. Sort of like a rough draft you can delete if it doesn’t fit your story.

This logic, of course, makes abortion perfectly acceptable in many people’s eyes. If it’s not a person, it’s not a problem. It’s just healthcare. It’s just a choice. Nothing morally complex about it. No more controversial than getting a tooth pulled or having a mole removed.

But then a tragic situation unfolds. A pregnant woman is murdered. And just like that, the news flashes the headline:

"DOUBLE HOMICIDE."

Wait. What?

Double?

How did we go from “clump of cells” to “second victim” so quickly? Did the fetus suddenly gain personhood because someone else, not the mother, took its life? Did it become a real human being the moment a criminal intervened instead of a doctor?

It’s a stunning transformation. One moment, it’s a non-person. The next, it’s a life so valuable that taking it warrants a second murder charge. No scientific breakthrough happened between those two events. Just a shift in who made the decision.

That’s the uncomfortable truth at the heart of this contradiction. When a woman chooses abortion, we’re told there’s only one life involved. But when a pregnant woman is killed, we mourn two. Why? Because in that scenario, the baby was wanted.

So now, personhood depends on preference? That’s not science. That’s not law. That’s moral relativism dressed up in legal language.

This isn’t just a philosophical inconsistency. It’s a legal one. In many states, you can be charged with double homicide for killing a pregnant woman, even if the fetus wasn’t yet viable. That same fetus, just days earlier, could have been legally aborted with no consequences. The value of the life is determined entirely by circumstance.

Let’s be clear. This isn’t about religion. You don’t have to believe in God to see the hypocrisy. You don’t need a Bible verse to recognize the absurdity of saying something is both a person and not a person depending on who ends its life. Whether you’re pro-life, pro-choice, or somewhere in the messy middle, you’ve got to admit it’s intellectually dishonest.

The truth is, we can’t keep pretending that personhood is a moving target. Either the unborn child is a human life with intrinsic value, or it’s not. You don’t become a person because someone wants you. You don’t lose your value because someone doesn’t.

So the next time you hear someone say, “Abortion isn’t murder, it’s healthcare,” ask them this:

“Then why is killing a pregnant woman called double homicide?”

Watch the answer twist itself into knots.

Is it complicated? Sure. Is it uncomfortable? Definitely. But if we’re going to talk about rights, justice, and human dignity, we have to start with consistency. Because a society that can’t define when life begins, can’t be trusted to defend it.

Location: Windhoek, Namibia

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GRADUATED BUT BLOCKED: NAMIBIA’S NEW NURSING EVALUATION FAILING FUTURE HEALTHCARE HEROES

In what should be a moment of triumph and relief for newly completed nursing students in Namibia, many are instead facing distress, uncertainty, and financial strain. The Nursing Council of Namibia (NCN) has introduced a new policy that requires student nurses, who have already completed their academic and clinical training, to undergo additional oral and written evaluations before they can graduate. While the intention may be to uphold professional standards, the reality on the ground tells a much more troubling story. A Policy of Double Standards One of the most glaring issues with this new policy is its selective application. Only newly completed student nurses are being subjected to this extra evaluation, while previously qualified nurses continue to practice without undergoing the same process. This creates an unfair and discriminatory standard. If the aim is truly to protect public health, shouldn’t all practicing nurses be held to the same level of scrutiny? The inconsistency is...
Read more

QUESTIONABLE SPENDING ON FAREWELL FOR NAMIBIA'S FOUNDING FATHER

By: Gideon Kapuka This week, the Namibian government allocated over 7 million Namibian dollars to transport the remains of former President Sam Nujoma across the country, to at least seven of Namibia’s fourteen regions. The question that immediately arises is: Is this an expenditure of genuine necessity? Namibia is currently battling a devastating drought, one that is projected to persist until the next harvest season. Against this backdrop of urgent national hardship, the government’s decision to deploy substantial state resources towards a national funeral, while vital issues such as drought relief and infrastructure demands remain unaddressed, is not only alarming but also difficult to defend. While there is no denying that Sam Nujoma, as the country’s founding president, made indelible contributions to Namibia’s historical and political landscape, the current approach to honoring his memory through such extravagant expenditure is deeply contentious. Acknowledging the legacy of a n...
Read more

A CRITIQUE OF SAM NUJOMA’S LEGACY

By: Gideon Kapuka  Sam Nujoma, the founding president of the Republic of Namibia, is undeniably a pivotal figure in the country's history. As a central leader in the struggle for independence from South African colonial rule, he is hailed as a hero who brought Namibia to the threshold of freedom. However, a critical examination of his presidency uncovers a more troubling legacy—one that is marked not only by the persistence of deep poverty and inequality but also by widespread corruption that undermined the very principles of the liberation struggle. While Nujoma's role in securing Namibia's independence is not up for debate, the economic and social promises that accompanied that liberation were left largely unfulfilled. The slogan of "it's our time now" is emblematic of a mindset that has plagued many post-independence African leaders, and Nujoma was no exception. Under his leadership, the wealth and resources of the nation became concentrated in the hands of...
Read more