THE "SHOCKING" TRUTH ABOUT HUMAN ORIGINS – SORRY, BUT SCIENCE WINS AGAIN

Humanity—so advanced, yet so fragile when confronted with facts. The internet is filled with people who passionately reject science while using smartphones powered by, you guessed it, science. And one of their favorite topics? The birthplace of modern humans.  

Let's break it down, nice and slow, for those who still think Africa couldn’t possibly be the starting point of Homo sapiens.  

1. "But There Are Older Bones Found Outside Africa!" 

Oh yes, let's start with this classic argument. It's always amusing when people bring up fossils from Europe or Asia and say, "See? That proves humans didn’t come from Africa!"  

Spoiler alert: No, it doesn’t.   

Those other fossils? They belong to different human species—Neanderthals, Homo erectus, Denisovans, and even the hobbit-like Homo floresiensis. Fascinating, yes. But modern humans? The only species still alive? Those bones point back to Africa. The oldest known Homo sapiens fossils—233,000 years old—were found in Ethiopia. And before anyone gets too excited about Morocco’s 300,000-year-old remains, those aren't definitively modern Homo sapiens, but a close ancestor.  

But sure, maybe the real first humans just happened to settle in places with acidic, damp soil that conveniently erased all their remains. You know, because evolution planned for that.  

2. "But Other Civilizations Had Buildings First!"

Yes, because apparently, the only way to prove early human origins is by showcasing ancient skyscrapers. Forget biological evolution, DNA evidence, or fossils—show me the pyramids!  

Listen, humans spent most of their early existence running away from predators, figuring out how to start fires, and, you know, not dying. The fact that ancient Egypt built impressive structures thousands of years later has absolutely zero relevance to where Homo sapiens originated.  

Civilization ≠ Origin. Try harder.  

3. "We Are All Equally Related to Early Humans!"

This one’s actually true. Congratulations! You finally got something right.  

Yes, whether you're as pale as a ghost or as dark as the night sky, your ancestors all walked out of Africa at some point. That means no, black people aren’t "more" connected to early humans than white or Asian people. Evolution doesn’t play favorites.   

That said, pretending Africa had nothing to do with human origins is like denying that water is wet.  

4. "But Darwin’s Theory Was Racist!"

Oh boy. Another classic.  

Yes, some 19th-century European scholars twisted Darwin’s ideas to fit their ridiculous "hierarchies of race." But guess what? That wasn’t Darwin’s fault. Science didn’t say white people were more "evolved"—racists did. They also thought the Earth was 6,000 years old and that diseases were caused by bad air. Should we bring those theories back too?  

5. "I Just Don’t Buy the African Birthplace Theory!"

Ah, the grand finale—the "I just don’t buy it" defense. Because, as we all know, refusing to believe something automatically makes it false.  

Science doesn’t care about your feelings. It doesn’t care about personal biases. It follows evidence. And the evidence—fossils, genetics, archaeology—keeps pointing to one inconvenient truth: Modern humans evolved in Africa and then spread across the globe, adapting to different environments over time. Period.  


Reality Check Time

It’s funny how people will deny Africa’s role in human origins while simultaneously using DNA tests that confirm their ancestry. Oh, the irony.  

But in the end, does it really matter? We are all human. Race is a surface-level adaptation, a product of geography, not superiority or inferiority. So whether you like it or not, Africa is part of your history. Instead of fighting science, maybe it’s time to embrace it.  

Class dismissed. Leave opinions in the comment section below 👇🏽

Location: Windhoek, Namibia

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GRADUATED BUT BLOCKED: NAMIBIA’S NEW NURSING EVALUATION FAILING FUTURE HEALTHCARE HEROES

In what should be a moment of triumph and relief for newly completed nursing students in Namibia, many are instead facing distress, uncertainty, and financial strain. The Nursing Council of Namibia (NCN) has introduced a new policy that requires student nurses, who have already completed their academic and clinical training, to undergo additional oral and written evaluations before they can graduate. While the intention may be to uphold professional standards, the reality on the ground tells a much more troubling story. A Policy of Double Standards One of the most glaring issues with this new policy is its selective application. Only newly completed student nurses are being subjected to this extra evaluation, while previously qualified nurses continue to practice without undergoing the same process. This creates an unfair and discriminatory standard. If the aim is truly to protect public health, shouldn’t all practicing nurses be held to the same level of scrutiny? The inconsistency is...
Read more

QUESTIONABLE SPENDING ON FAREWELL FOR NAMIBIA'S FOUNDING FATHER

By: Gideon Kapuka This week, the Namibian government allocated over 7 million Namibian dollars to transport the remains of former President Sam Nujoma across the country, to at least seven of Namibia’s fourteen regions. The question that immediately arises is: Is this an expenditure of genuine necessity? Namibia is currently battling a devastating drought, one that is projected to persist until the next harvest season. Against this backdrop of urgent national hardship, the government’s decision to deploy substantial state resources towards a national funeral, while vital issues such as drought relief and infrastructure demands remain unaddressed, is not only alarming but also difficult to defend. While there is no denying that Sam Nujoma, as the country’s founding president, made indelible contributions to Namibia’s historical and political landscape, the current approach to honoring his memory through such extravagant expenditure is deeply contentious. Acknowledging the legacy of a n...
Read more

A CRITIQUE OF SAM NUJOMA’S LEGACY

By: Gideon Kapuka  Sam Nujoma, the founding president of the Republic of Namibia, is undeniably a pivotal figure in the country's history. As a central leader in the struggle for independence from South African colonial rule, he is hailed as a hero who brought Namibia to the threshold of freedom. However, a critical examination of his presidency uncovers a more troubling legacy—one that is marked not only by the persistence of deep poverty and inequality but also by widespread corruption that undermined the very principles of the liberation struggle. While Nujoma's role in securing Namibia's independence is not up for debate, the economic and social promises that accompanied that liberation were left largely unfulfilled. The slogan of "it's our time now" is emblematic of a mindset that has plagued many post-independence African leaders, and Nujoma was no exception. Under his leadership, the wealth and resources of the nation became concentrated in the hands of...
Read more